Debate+Arena

Group projects are interesting as they often allow students to take more control in the project than other assignments. From my experience, online group projects seem to work just as well as group projects done in a physical classroom. I think that more communication takes place between the group members because they are using other ways to get in touch (e.g. email, chats, phone calls, etc.). In a regular group project, students don't usually meet together as often or communicate with each other as much. (In my opinion). :) I think it is a great idea for building unity. However, there is always the risk that one student will take over and others will "ride along." There are balances that can be put in place to minimize this such as having evaluation sheets (which provides both internal and external motivation). In regard to grading group projects, a good rubric is needed in order for all students to be graded against the same standard. (This also helps with evening out the work load among group members.) As a whole, I enjoyed the Debate Arena. It was a neat way to have a group project. Everyone (in the group at least) :) unites for a common cause and tries to find the best support for their position. This type of project encourages digging deeper into research.